I am the Rector of two of the three churches in the world dedicated to St Hybald, one of which (Hibaldstow) contains his remains. This blog is mainly for my monthly parish magazine articles.

Disclaimer: Calling myself "Hybald's Rector" does not imply that St Hybald would agree with everything I say!!

Tuesday, 2 September 2025

Conkering King

Here's an extended version of my article for September:

Image by Mabel Amber from Pixabay


With Autumn fast approaching, golden brown leaves will be falling to the ground along with various nuts and seeds, and perhaps the most nostalgia-inducing of all is the conker. The shiny mahogany-brown shell can evoke happy memories of childhood games, or even just the joy of collecting as many as you can. The game of conkers, like many traditional games, has many different variants, rules and scoring systems. Often a conker's score increases by defeating another conker, and it's designation reflects that: so, a conker that has beaten one other is called a 'one-er'; then if it defeats another it becomes a 'two-er' and so on. A variant of this is that the victorious conker receives all the victories of the defeated conker: thus a 'four-er' that defeats a 'two-er' becomes a 'six-er' (or sometimes a 'seven-er' if it also gets a point for the victory too – cue many a playground dispute!!).

Sometimes games and sports are seen as practice for, or imitation of, battles or geo-political events. And the system in conkers of ranking based on previous victories, and in particular of absorbing the victories of the defeated conker, has a parallel in ancient history. From the twelfth century BC onwards, it was common in the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent for the supreme ruler of the area to be known as the “King of Kings” often because they or their predecessors had defeated the other rulers in the region. Two of the Persian kings mentioned in the Bible, Darius and Xerxes, referred to themselves as the King of Kings, and variations of this title were used by the rulers of the Greek Empire which defeated Persia to become the regional superpower.

For us, the title 'King of Kings' is more usually associated with Jesus, and is often paired with a similar title 'Lord of Lords' – and these words will have many people thinking of the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel's Messiah!!  The visions of the four earthly kingdoms in Daniel chapters 2 and 7 teach how “the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever” (Daniel 2:44). Jesus' earliest followers saw that Jesus was the King of that promised kingdom, and therefore the ultimate King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

The odd thing about this is that Jesus never had a position of power or authority during his earthly ministry. His death was that of the lowest criminal and the few followers he had at that time deserted him. The inscription on his cross ('Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews') was deeply ironic, as was the crown of thorns and purple robe the guards made him wear before his crucifixion, and Pilate's declaration “Here is your king!” (John 19:14). However, Paul tells us in Philippians 2 that it was because Jesus laid aside his divine majesty, to become human so that he could die to take the punishment we deserve for our sins, that his Father raised him from the dead and “gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord.” So we have a choice: either follow earthly authorities who grasp self-interestedly after power which will fade, or follow the One who gave self-sacrificially for us and will rule forever.