Cars and Signs

Here's my article for the February magazines:

As an adult, presents tend to fall into the categories of practical, edible or amusing.  This Christmas I received a book that was given in the spirit of the latter category: “Driving School” by Mark Philpott.  The book's subtitle is “Learning about life, God and the Bible through the world of motoring”, and in it Philpott looks at the world of cars and driving to see what we they might teach us about God and life.  As I read through it, I saw that some of the links Philpott makes are almost as tenuous as the links I make in these articles!!

You might ask whether drawing lessons about God from 'everyday life' is a legitimate exercise, or just trying to 'shoehorn' a religious message into a religiously neutral topic – can rallying really tell us anything about the Christian life? (see page 52 for the answer!!).  Unsurprisingly, I do think it is a legitimate thing to do for three reasons.  Firstly, Psalm 19:1 tells us that “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands” - in other words the Creation bears the fingerprints of the Creator.  When we look at the universe with awe and wonder it's because it reminds us of the awesome and wonderful God who created it, so we can learn about God from his creation.  As the Apostle Paul says in Romans 1:20 “Men cannot say they do not know about God. From the beginning of the world, men could see what God is like through the things He has made” (New Life Version). Secondly, as we humans are made in God's image (Genesis 1:26-27) the things we create and do can also tell us about God.  Amongst other things our love of sports, music and science, as well as our desire for justice and our capacity for love are all reflections of the image of God within us and can teach us about him.

But above all, I think it's legitimate because there are so many examples of it in the Bible:

In Proverbs 6:6 ants are used as an example of working hard; Psalm 32:9 tells us not to be like a horse that needs to be controlled by bit and bridle.  In Isaiah 64:8 God is described as a potter, and most famously in Psalm 23 he is described as a shepherd.  Jesus also uses the image of a shepherd to describe himself (John 10), as well as using farmers (Luke 8:1-15), builders (Matthew 7:24-27), bridesmaids (Matthew 25:1-13) and fishermen (Matthew 4:19) to illustrate his teachings.

In the section on Road Signs, Philpott talks about the signs in the Old Testament that point to Jesus as the Messiah and the divine Son of God, and how many people in his own day ignored those signs.  We don't just have the Old Testament signs, and the signs all around us, but we have the record of Jesus' words and actions, which were written, as John says, “that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31).  Ignoring these signs is as disastrous as ignoring road signs.

But if cars aren't your thing, there is also 'Flight School' available, with 'Farm School', 'Battle School' and others to come! 

Do we know it's Christmas?

Here's my December article:

By the time you read this article you may already be sick of hearing Christmas songs wherever you go. Just as 'The Chicken Song' parodied summer songs, Peter Kay, as 'Geraldine McQueen', lovingly parodied Christmas songs in 'Once Upon a Christmas Song' singing “It's getting in your head / And if you're not singing it all night, / You'd be telling a lie, / You'll be singing this over and over, and over again.”

Everyone has their own favourite Christmas song (and usually at least one that they hate!) but the chances are that at some point you'll hear at least one version of “Do they know it's Christmas?” It was Christmas Number 1 in 1984 by Band Aid and spawned three cover versions which also went to Number 1. The original was written to raise money for Ethiopia in the wake of the famine there, and is the best selling Christmas song of all time, selling 3.82 million units. This is despite it being generally recognised as having little artistic merit as a song, including by its writers - although as Midge Ure wrote in his autobiography “It was all about generating money... The song didn't matter: the song was secondary, almost irrelevant.”

But to some the song does matter. It has been accused of a patronising view of Western 'civilisations' coming to the rescue of poor Africans. It also is wildly inaccurate, claiming “there won't be snow in Africa this Christmas time” (not even on Mount Kilimanjaro or the Atlas mountains?), and that it's a place “where nothing ever grows”(!) and “no rain or rivers flow.” Of course, as the cause of the song was a famine, this might be forgiveable hyperbole, but as the song has been reissued and this line kept it perpetuates a misleading picture of Africa, which in fact has two of the top ten wettest places in the world and two of the top ten longest rivers in the world (including the longest!).

Bob Geldof responded to such analysis of the inaccuracies in the lyrics by saying that its just a pop song not a doctoral thesis. However, the most problematic aspect of the song is the view it has of what Christmas actually means.

It suggest that the reason that Africans might not know it's Christmas is because they won't have parties, snow, presents and food and drink – and this says a lot about what we think Christmas is all about. As African Christians appear in the New Testament, and more Christians live in Africa than any other continent it is unlikely that they don't know it's Christmas! More than that, each year the charity Open Doors published a 'World Watch List' (an annual ranking of the 50 countries where Christians face the most extreme persecution) and five of the top ten worst countries are in Africa. So not only do Africans know what Christmas is, they are prepared to suffer for their belief in the Jesus whose birth is celebrated at Christmas.

A Somalian woman who was tortured for her faith said “Previously I didn’t have happiness, but now I have joy… I know that until I came to know Jesus, I knew nothing at all.” If this time of year is just about presents and parties, perhaps it's us who don't know it's Christmas.

Is death really nothing at all?

Here is my November article:

Henry Scott Holland (1847-1918) [Source: www.commons.wikimedia.org/]

November is traditionally a month where we recall those who have died, possibly because of All Saints day at the beginning of the month, but more probably because the days are getting darker, the weather is getting worse, the plants around us are dying back. We have a fascination with death, as is demonstrated by the 'going viral' of my friend, Dr Allan Barton's niche YouTube videos on various burial customs, particularly royal ones.

This year we have thought about death quite a lot; there are still the consequences of the pandemic and of course we have had the death of Queen Elizabeth II. The sermon preached by the Archbishop of Canterbury at Her Late Majesty's funeral has been lauded by many people, and it reminded me of another sermon preached after a monarch's death that is very famous, even if its origin isn't.

At St Paul's Cathedral in May 1910 before the Lying in State of King Edward VII, Canon Henry Scott-Holland delivered a sermon titled “Death, the King of Terrors.” This sermon contained words that have become one of the most frequently used poems at funerals, usually called “Death is nothing at all” which expresses a belief in the continuity of the relationship between the deceased and the mourner. However, this was not the message Scott-Holland was trying to get across in his sermon.

Instead he was contrasting two views of death: “First there is the familiar and instinctive recoil from it as embodying the supreme and irrevocable disaster…Nothing leads up to it, nothing prepares for it. It simply traverses every line on which life runs, cutting across every hope on which life feeds…It makes all we do here meaningless and empty…” This is the view of “the terror of the unknown, the terror of loss, the terror of finality.” The second view is that expressed by “Death is nothing at all”, that talks of “the trick played us by seeming death. It is not death; nobody is dead...Everything that we cared for and loved exists...Nothing that we see in this dead material now laid out under our eyes represents or involves or includes the thing that was or is alive.”

The first view of death is what an honest atheist should have: if we are mere accidents of atomic collisions and chance events then death is final and ultimately makes life meaningless. The second view is that of those who feel that there is more to life than the materialist atheist view, but in the absence of a reasoned religious belief wishfully hopes that what we value continues beyond death.

Scott-Holland contrasts these two approaches to death: “the mood of violent recoil” and “the mood of quiet continuity” and then says “Our task is to deny neither judgement, but to combine both. The contrasted experiences are equally real, equally valid.” We need to avoid the trap of either despair or denial in the face of the the fact of death, as well as acknowledge the truth behind both experiences.

This is only possible through Jesus' death and resurrection, which guarantees both the defeat of the finality of death and the possibility of the continuity of eternal life. But in order for this to happen we must undergo death ourselves; not physical death but putting to death the sins which make us spiritually dead, by repenting and allowing the Holy Spirit to breathe new life into us. As Jesus promises: “Those who believe in me will live, even though they die; and those who live and believe in me will never die.” (John 11:25-26).

Grief and hope at empty tombs

Here's my sermon for this year's Remembrance service at Broughton:

Last Thursday, the Cubs, Scouts and Explorers came to church to think about Remembrance Sunday and created these poppies to decorate the church with for today. We thought about the two minutes silence and how, for some people, in the first minute we recall those who have died in the two world wars, and whose names we hear read out, and in the second minute we think of all those affected by war, through injury, bereavement or loss of homes and livelihoods.

So on these poppies we wrote on the top half a name of someone from Broughton who died in the two world wars, and then on the bottom half people that we pray for during the service, either because they are suffering because of war or because they are trying to make peace. So thank you to the Cubs, Scouts and Explorers for helping us to remember the purpose of Remembrance Sunday – to remember and to pray.

Of course, this two minutes silence happens at our poignant War Memorial: with our soldier deep in thought, remembering his friends who have died and holding in his hand a laurel leaf for peace. Remembering and praying.

There are many war memorials throughout the country – from simple plaques to huge monuments but almost all of them have one thing in common – they are technically cenotaphs. A cenotaph is a monument to someone who has died and whose body is buried elsewhere and I learnt recently that the word 'cenotaph' comes from two Greek words meaning 'empty tomb'. So these cenotaphs are not graves but memorials.

This reminds us that so many of those who went to war never came back, for most not even their bodies came back and for some the location of their bodies is unknown. In the absence of a proper grave, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier represents all those whose bodies never returned, and all our local cenotaphs are testament to the absence in all senses of the word of those who never returned from war.

We gather at an empty tomb to remember those who should be here but aren't. And as we feel the pain of the empty tomb we commit ourselves to praying for all those who suffer because of war and violence, and all those who are working for peace and justice.

But we don't just gather at the cenotaph, we also gather here in church, where the words 'empty tomb' have a different resonance.

In our first reading (Acts 13:26-39) we hear the words of the apostle Paul telling people in a synagogue about Jesus. He tells them that Jesus was unfairly tried and unjustly put to death, but that he was raised from the dead, and that unlike his ancestor, the great King David, his body did not decay. Instead there was an empty tomb. And because of that empty tomb Paul could say for certain that Jesus' death is the way sins can be forgiven, as Jesus himself had said it would. And it's those sins of course which lead to war and violence. Therefore, Paul goes on, everyone who believes and trusts in Jesus is set free from their sins, something that is simply not possible through being a good person doing good things.

That empty tomb is the central belief of Christianity – if it is untrue, as Paul says elsewhere, then our faith is pointless, but if it is true it should change every part of our lives. If Jesus has not been raised to life again then all graves are empty tombs – they all mark people who no longer exist except as dust and ashes and memories – merely names carved on stone. If Jesus has not been raised all grief is without hope – we will never see those we love again. But if Jesus has been raised from the dead then those who believe and trust in him will share eternal life together.

To stand at the empty tomb of Jesus is to celebrate that death is no longer the final word in our lives either personally or as a world. In our second reading (Luke 21:5-19) Jesus teaches his disciples that after his death and resurrection he will return to his Father for a while before he returns to earth again at the end of time. In the meantime there will be suffering, wars and disasters, and his followers will be persecuted. His promise is that those who remain faithful will receive eternal life. But when he returns death and suffering, along with war and disaster, will be got rid of once and for all and justice will be done. Without that empty tomb, death, suffering, wars and disasters will continue, and evil will go unpunished.

So as we gather around the cenotaph, the empty tomb, let us remember those who died and pray for those who suffer and who work for peace. But let us also remember that it is only by gathering by faith around the empty tomb of Jesus that there is the certain hope of an end to injustice, suffering, wars and death.

Harvest Thanksgivings - not just for food

Here's my article for October:

Harvest is a time for thanksgiving - across the country churches and schools will gather for services which focus on being thankful for the world, and especially for the food we eat, those who produce it and also God who is ultimately responsible for it. It is quite right to give thanks to God for the gift of creation and all the ways he blesses us through the natural world. But it's not just the created world that we need to remember to be thankful for, we also need to be thankful for each other.

During the worst months of the pandemic we got used to being thankful for the NHS and other 'key workers' but this year our thankfulness has mainly been focused on one person: Her Late Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II. Earlier in the year we joyfully celebrated her Platinum Jubilee and there were many books, speeches, articles, videos and programmes talking about 'Our Faithful Queen' and giving thanks for her 70 year reign. In our Jubilee celebration service we thanked God “for the example of loving and faithful service which she has shown among us” and prayed that he would help us to “follow her example of dedication and to commit our lives to you and to one another.” We also observed that she herself “follows the example set for her, reminding us that 'God sent his only Son “to serve, not to be served”. He restored love and service to the centre of our lives in the person of Jesus Christ.' ” Then, last month, we recalled with thanksgiving her life of dedication and service as we mourned her death.

An important part of many funerals is the eulogy where the life of the deceased is recalled, and there is often a time of reflection where all those present can silently recall their own memories. I usually introduce this time of reflection by suggesting that the congregation thank God for the person who has died and also thank God for the way that God has blessed us through that person. As we mourned the death of Queen Elizabeth, so much was said about the effect that she had, not only on those who met her, but also on the course of world events. An unlike a lot of her predecessors and some world leaders today, she did this not through revolutions, battles and invasions but often with a simple gesture: a handshake, a nod of the head, a laugh.

The simple gestures we make may not have historic, world-changing effects, but they can change the lives of those around us, even in ways we cannot see. The song “Thank You” by Ray Boltz imagines a scene in heaven where someone is shown the effect their life has. Some of the lyrics are: “One by one they came, far as the eyes could see. Each life somehow touched by your generosity. Little things that you had done, sacrifices made, unnoticed on the earth, in heaven now proclaimed.” It's sometimes said that it's a shame we don't hear our eulogies before we die, so perhaps this harvest time we could say thank you to someone who's touched our lives.

Commemoration Service Sermon

Here is the sermon I preached at the parish Commemoration Services marking the death of Her Late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II:

If you've spent any time over the past couple of days watching the news on T.V. or online, or reading the newspapers , or listening to it on the radio, or even looking at social media – you'll have been bombarded with information about the late Queen's life and reign, and stories people tell about meeting her. And of course we have heard a lot of it already this year as we celebrated that historic milestone, the Platinum Jubilee of her reign just a few short months ago. I don't have anything original to add to that huge volume of information, anecdote and commentary (and you can still read my article on the Platinum Jubilee on my blog – please do like, subscribe and share! [you can also read my article on the occasion of her 90th birthday]) - I don't have anything original to say, but I'll keep in line with the tradition of 24hr news coverage, of which someone said “It's full of people with nothing to say, but who insist on saying it!”

As I've been listening over the past few days, two things have struck me: one about her life and one about her death. So firstly about her life. We have a tendency not to want to speak ill of the dead, but in the case of Queen Elizabeth II there seems to be very little to speak ill of her about. Even those who don't agree with the institution of the monarchy, have expressed their admiration and respect for the person of Queen Elizabeth. It seems that everyone that has met her has spoken fondly of their memories, and even those who haven't met her describe her in glowing terms. Words like 'dutiful', 'fun', 'selfless', 'tireless' and 'warm' are often used; and people describe how nervous they'd been to meet her, but how she made them feel relaxed and at ease. Others say how she put the 'Great' into Great Britain, or the 'United' into the United Kingdom. The new Prime Minister, Liz Truss, called her “the rock on which modern Britain was built.”

One aspect that occasionally, but not often, gets mentioned is the deep, profound and living faith that the late Queen had. She was able to be the rock on which modern Britain was built precisely because she built her own life on that of the Rock of Ages, Jesus Christ. She would often in her Christmas speeches say how her life was shaped by the example of Jesus and how she was sustained by her relationship with him. She was a faithful Queen – not just faithful in her duty to her people throughout the world but full of faith in the God who called her to her rôle. And that faith shone through her. Gavin Ashenden who was one of her chaplains said “The reason you like her is because you can smell God in her” and that seems to be true whether you met her or not.

He went on to say that her character, all those qualities people mention over and over again, are what Christians call the 'fruit of the Spirit' - love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control – when someone is full of God's Holy Spirit, this is what they are like.

So her life was a reflection and the consequence of her faith in Jesus. But what about her death?

You've probably seen various pictures or heard poems describing her death. They usually involve either Prince Philip coming to get her, or Paddington Bear leading her to heaven. I'm not sure what the theological significance of Paddington Bear is, but the idea that those who believe and trust in Jesus in this life will be resurrected and join with all those faithful followers of Jesus from throughout the ages in eternal life, is a deep rooted and biblical idea. But as we heard in our reading from John's gospel (John 14:1-6,27), it is Jesus himself that will come to get us so that we will be where he is. And the picture in that reading is of a house with many rooms – something that Queen Elizabeth was very familiar with! And it would not be inaccurate to describe this house as a palace, because it is the house of the King of kings, but in this palace there are no protocols to be followed, there is no ranking, there are no barriers or police cordons between the people and the King. As our first reading (Revelation 21:1-7) tells us God will dwell with us and he will be so close to us that he will be able to wipe away every tear from our eyes.

As a faithful follower of Jesus, this was Queen Elizabeth's confident hope and expectation, that at her death, her King and Saviour Jesus would come to her and take her to live with him forever. And ever so gently she would encourage us who are left to build our lives on the Rock that is Jesus, to turn to him in repentance and faith, that we too might live in that eternal palace, and meet her there, but most 
importantly to meet our Saviour, the Almighty and Eternal King, Jesus.



Here's the link to the service itself:

and here's the Order of Service:

11th September: the day that changed the world forever?

Here's my article for Broughton's September magazine:

It has become this generation's 'JFK' moment: where were you when the World Trade Centre was attacked? I remember I was working at Liverpool Hope University College at the time and we were watching the events unfold on a large screen in the Reception area that was usually used for announcements and PR. Then in the evening I was in a bar celebrating a friend's birthday, whilst the aftermath was playing on the small screens around the room.

Particularly in the USA, 11th September 2001 is often called “the day that changed the world forever.” It is true that many things have changed since those attacks; airport security, the 'War on Terror', attitudes to immigration to name but a few. The attacks also affected the USA psychologically, given the audacity of the attacks and the symbolism of the targets: these were strikes at what the USA prized as its successes: its economic strength (the WTC); its military strength (the Pentagon); and its system of government (the failed attempt on the Capitol).

Although these were attacks on the USA, they were also seen as an attack on the whole of Western civilisation and its reverence for economic and military power, and its governance.   As such there was a brief moment after the attacks when the question was asked: “Why do they hate us so much?” which could have given rise to a humbler view of ourselves as we see that our way is not the only nor the most perfect way of doing things. But quickly thoughts turned to using our economic and military power to punish and avenge, and also try to impose our Western liberal democracy on other cultures.

So it could be argued that 11th September 2001 was the day that changed the world forever. But the same could be argued for many important days in history, and also for little-known days in history. Just as you could argue that the Battle of Waterloo changed the world forever, so too could the day that Napoleon was born, or the day his parents met etc. The things you and I will do today will change the world forever.

But one day truly could be said to be the day the world changed forever: the day Jesus was born. The visible effects of his birth are obvious: our dating of years refers to his birth, the movement he inspired provides the foundation of Western Civilisation – our concepts of justice, human dignity, compassion, as well as science, education and morality. But more importantly, “God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him” (John 3:17) and “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” (1 Timothy 1:15). It is only through Jesus that justice will be done and all the wrongs of the world, which are caused by the sins all of us have, will be put right. His birth was the day that really changed the world forever. And some scholars say Biblical, historical, and astronomical evidence point to that day being in 3 B.C. on Wednesday, 11th September.